If you're seeking the bottom line without having to negotiate the mire of my convoluted grammar, I was disappointed by the dinner at La Noce (3 Chu Lin Road). Disappointments happen because expectations surpass reality. And little things add up. No offence intended to the good chef Salvatore Catalano and his crew - the service was good and well appreciated. But for what they were charging, the food here definitely has ways to go. Good service doesn't quite make up for everything. It wasn't that we came in expecting flawless culinary execution of the highest level. In fact, I thought we had very grounded expectations.
The menu was pretty straightforward. Mostly "run of the mill" range of antipasti, pasta, meats and dessert. There was also pizza which wasn't listed in the menu and small list of weekly specials. One of which was a ravioli with white truffle stuffing which didn't quite turn out as it sounded.
The 18 month Parma ham with melon was atypical. The ham had a velvet-like in texture (which I liked) but otherwise, not much noteworthy. The melon didn't taste sweet to me and wasn't juicy.
The waiter had, when asked, insisted that the ravioli was stuffed only with white truffles and we were knew that it could not be true because it cost $24. After the first ravioli, we were beyond certain. While I did not reasonably expect the waiter's claim to be true, it was the insistence on their part that unsettled me. If you wanted to know, there was a bit of shaven white truffles on the top of the ravioli and there was a hint of the flavour from the them. Otherwise, it was a creamy cheese sauce and I was quite sure that the stuffings, if it included any white truffle at all, was mostly cheese.
This grilled lamb rack was pretty good. Found it rather enjoyable and it was probably the best thing served tonight. Despite the meat being a little dry, the doneness was good and there was natural flavour of lamb with a nice rosemary aroma on the surface. I still think that the charcoal grilled ones from Kazu are superior, but these here were definitely more meaty. If there was anything I would recommend from what we had, it would be this.
This beef tenderloin was actually a replacement dish after the restaurant failed a total of three attempts to do an ossobuco for two persons. That beef tenderloin was competent if unexceptional. A proper medium rare but the meat wasn't juicy like we had hoped for. Back to the failed ossobuco which I wanted get off my system - it was redone twice. When it first arrived, I was shocked (yes, 'aghast' would be a an appropriate word too) at how hard the meat was when I first tried to prod it with my fork thinking that the fork was all I needed to eat it. I made mention to the waiter and the dish was brought it back to the kitchen for a replacement. I wasn't sure if it was changed or merely redone but in the second round, the results were similar. The third attempt at the dish resulted in something that was rubbery and dry. Yeap, I said rubbery. The sauces look dried out from having being redone and the meat on the shank looked blistered. Definitely not something that one would expect of braised meat. And through it all, the waiter looked like he was totally ignorant of the fact that the meat was supposed to be tender and should be fork tender. The chef did personally apologise regarding the quality of the meat which we had graciously accepted, but a disappointment's a disappointment.
For $30, I didn't quite find this dessert platter enjoyable. We've had better tiramisu and our home made version was more enjoyable. I shit you not. The panna cotta was very ordinary and actually tasted better without the berry compote. Profiterole was ordinary and the pie which was supposedly a pine tart tasted like it only has custard filling.
I'm not sure if I'm ever coming back given the remote location and food.
The menu was pretty straightforward. Mostly "run of the mill" range of antipasti, pasta, meats and dessert. There was also pizza which wasn't listed in the menu and small list of weekly specials. One of which was a ravioli with white truffle stuffing which didn't quite turn out as it sounded.
The 18 month Parma ham with melon was atypical. The ham had a velvet-like in texture (which I liked) but otherwise, not much noteworthy. The melon didn't taste sweet to me and wasn't juicy.
The waiter had, when asked, insisted that the ravioli was stuffed only with white truffles and we were knew that it could not be true because it cost $24. After the first ravioli, we were beyond certain. While I did not reasonably expect the waiter's claim to be true, it was the insistence on their part that unsettled me. If you wanted to know, there was a bit of shaven white truffles on the top of the ravioli and there was a hint of the flavour from the them. Otherwise, it was a creamy cheese sauce and I was quite sure that the stuffings, if it included any white truffle at all, was mostly cheese.
This grilled lamb rack was pretty good. Found it rather enjoyable and it was probably the best thing served tonight. Despite the meat being a little dry, the doneness was good and there was natural flavour of lamb with a nice rosemary aroma on the surface. I still think that the charcoal grilled ones from Kazu are superior, but these here were definitely more meaty. If there was anything I would recommend from what we had, it would be this.
This beef tenderloin was actually a replacement dish after the restaurant failed a total of three attempts to do an ossobuco for two persons. That beef tenderloin was competent if unexceptional. A proper medium rare but the meat wasn't juicy like we had hoped for. Back to the failed ossobuco which I wanted get off my system - it was redone twice. When it first arrived, I was shocked (yes, 'aghast' would be a an appropriate word too) at how hard the meat was when I first tried to prod it with my fork thinking that the fork was all I needed to eat it. I made mention to the waiter and the dish was brought it back to the kitchen for a replacement. I wasn't sure if it was changed or merely redone but in the second round, the results were similar. The third attempt at the dish resulted in something that was rubbery and dry. Yeap, I said rubbery. The sauces look dried out from having being redone and the meat on the shank looked blistered. Definitely not something that one would expect of braised meat. And through it all, the waiter looked like he was totally ignorant of the fact that the meat was supposed to be tender and should be fork tender. The chef did personally apologise regarding the quality of the meat which we had graciously accepted, but a disappointment's a disappointment.
For $30, I didn't quite find this dessert platter enjoyable. We've had better tiramisu and our home made version was more enjoyable. I shit you not. The panna cotta was very ordinary and actually tasted better without the berry compote. Profiterole was ordinary and the pie which was supposedly a pine tart tasted like it only has custard filling.
I'm not sure if I'm ever coming back given the remote location and food.
What a bummer..!!
ReplyDeletethe tenderloin was good but as u said, was a replacement for the ossobuco. should we call it a "blessing in disguise" ? lol...yeah, the dessert platter was rather uninteresting despite the featured signature italian dolci(s)...
ReplyDelete